Conversation
Member
Author
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
rescript
@rescript/darwin-arm64
@rescript/darwin-x64
@rescript/linux-arm64
@rescript/linux-x64
@rescript/runtime
@rescript/win32-x64
commit: |
jfrolich
approved these changes
May 6, 2026
cknitt
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2026
* Close remaining rewatch build.lock gaps * CHANGELOG # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # rewatch/src/build.rs # rewatch/src/watcher.rs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
This is a follow-up to the earlier
build.lockfixes. Those changes covered the mainrescript buildpath, butrescript watchstill had artifact-mutating paths that could run without holdingbuild.lock.That matters because
initialize_buildis not read-only: it reads prior compile state and runscleanup_previous_build, which can remove stale compiler assets and generated JS underlib/bs.cleanup_after_buildandwrite_build_ninjaalso mutate build artifacts.Without this follow-up, a watch process could still race with an in-flight
rescript buildduring these remaining paths.Newly Covered Paths
This PR adds
build.lockcoverage for these remaining watch cases:Watch startup initialization
watcher::startcallsinitialize_buildto discover packages and source folders before entering the watch loop.build.lockbecause initialization may clean previous build artifacts.Watch full rebuild reinitialization
initialize_buildagain to rebuild package/module state.build.lock.Watch full rebuild artifact writes
build.ninja.build.lockboundary.Watch shutdown cleanup
watch.lockis removed, it callscleanup_after_build.build.lock.Locking Model
rescript buildholdsbuild.lockacross initialization, compilation, cleanup, andbuild.ninjawrites.incremental_build, which acquiresbuild.lock.build.lockbefore reinitialization and then call the unlocked incremental build body.build.lock.rescript cleanalready acquiresbuild.lockin the CLI entrypoint.Callers that already hold
build.lockuseincremental_build_without_lock, so this avoids duplicate locking and self-deadlocks.