Skip to content

feat: support logs endpoints#88

Merged
kewynakshlley merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/logs
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

feat: support logs endpoints#88
kewynakshlley merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/logs

Conversation

@kewynakshlley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 issues found across 8 files

Confidence score: 3/5

  • There is meaningful merge risk because src/main/java/com/resend/services/logs/Logs.java adds Logs SDK operations without explicit confirmation that existing production API keys have Logs-read permission, which could cause authorization failures for current users.
  • Test coverage confidence is limited: src/test/java/com/resend/services/logs/LogsTest.java mocks the Logs service itself, so tests may pass even if endpoint integration behavior is incorrect.
  • Given both issues are severity 7/10 with high confidence, this looks mergeable only with caution until permission compatibility and real behavior validation are confirmed.
  • Pay close attention to src/main/java/com/resend/services/logs/Logs.java, src/test/java/com/resend/services/logs/LogsTest.java - API key permission compatibility and endpoint-level test validity are the main regression risks.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="src/main/java/com/resend/services/logs/Logs.java">

<violation number="1" location="src/main/java/com/resend/services/logs/Logs.java:1">
P1: Custom agent: **API Key Permission Check SDK Methods**

New Logs SDK operations were added without an explicit confirmation that existing production API keys have Logs-read permission, which violates the API key permission check rule and can cause runtime authorization failures after release.</violation>
</file>

<file name="src/test/java/com/resend/services/logs/LogsTest.java">

<violation number="1" location="src/test/java/com/resend/services/logs/LogsTest.java:25">
P1: These tests mock the `Logs` service itself, so they do not validate real endpoint behavior and can pass even if `Logs` implementation is broken.</violation>
</file>

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.

Comment thread src/main/java/com/resend/services/logs/Logs.java
@BeforeEach
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
logs = mock(Logs.class);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1: These tests mock the Logs service itself, so they do not validate real endpoint behavior and can pass even if Logs implementation is broken.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At src/test/java/com/resend/services/logs/LogsTest.java, line 25:

<comment>These tests mock the `Logs` service itself, so they do not validate real endpoint behavior and can pass even if `Logs` implementation is broken.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+    @BeforeEach
+    public void setUp() {
+        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
+        logs = mock(Logs.class);
+    }
+
</file context>

@kewynakshlley kewynakshlley merged commit b445708 into main Apr 2, 2026
6 checks passed
@kewynakshlley kewynakshlley deleted the feat/logs branch April 2, 2026 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants