Clarify Quick Start workflow#48
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To continue reviewing without waiting, purchase usage credits in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe quick-start documentation was reorganized and expanded with several structural changes. A tabbed environment selector was introduced at the beginning for Cloud, Standalone, and Docker setup options. A new blog project example was added featuring a typed posts table with explicit row creation and field values. The documentation steps were reordered: Step 6 changed from "Commit Changes" to "Create an API Endpoint" with REST Draft endpoint configuration instructions. Step 7 (Query Your Data) was expanded to include guidance on making endpoints public, curl command examples, a complete JSON response example, and Swagger UI usage. A new Step 8 was added describing the optional commit workflow and the distinction between Draft and HEAD endpoints. Supporting content and visual references were updated throughout to accommodate these changes. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/quick-start.md (2)
154-154:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winAvoid introducing an unrelated
usertable in this walkthrough.This quick start only creates
posts; mentioning an extrausertable here breaks the narrative continuity and can confuse readers.Suggested doc tweak
-Click the **code icon** (`</>`) to open the Swagger UI. Notice how Head shows only committed tables, while Draft includes uncommitted changes (e.g., a new `user` table added after the last commit): +Click the **code icon** (`</>`) to open the Swagger UI. Notice how Head shows only committed state, while Draft includes uncommitted changes:🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/quick-start.md` at line 154, Remove the unrelated example of a `user` table in the sentence "Notice how Head shows only committed tables, while Draft includes uncommitted changes (e.g., a new `user` table added after the last commit)" and replace it with an example that matches the quick start (e.g., reference the `posts` table) so the walkthrough remains consistent with the content that only creates posts; update the parenthetical example to mention `posts` or remove the parenthetical entirely.
82-82:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winUse the Cloud app URL instead of the signup URL in the “Open the Admin UI” step.
For Step 2, linking to
/signupcan misdirect returning users; this step should point to the actual app/sign-in entry point.Suggested doc tweak
-- **Cloud:** [cloud.revisium.io](https://cloud.revisium.io/signup) — sign in with Google or GitHub +- **Cloud:** [cloud.revisium.io](https://cloud.revisium.io) — sign in with Google or GitHub🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/quick-start.md` at line 82, In the "Open the Admin UI" step update the Cloud link so it points to the app/sign-in entry rather than the signup page: replace the current markdown line "**Cloud:** [cloud.revisium.io](https://cloud.revisium.io/signup)" with a link to "https://cloud.revisium.io" (or the app's main sign-in entry) so returning users are directed to the proper app entry point instead of /signup.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@docs/quick-start.md`:
- Line 154: Remove the unrelated example of a `user` table in the sentence
"Notice how Head shows only committed tables, while Draft includes uncommitted
changes (e.g., a new `user` table added after the last commit)" and replace it
with an example that matches the quick start (e.g., reference the `posts` table)
so the walkthrough remains consistent with the content that only creates posts;
update the parenthetical example to mention `posts` or remove the parenthetical
entirely.
- Line 82: In the "Open the Admin UI" step update the Cloud link so it points to
the app/sign-in entry rather than the signup page: replace the current markdown
line "**Cloud:** [cloud.revisium.io](https://cloud.revisium.io/signup)" with a
link to "https://cloud.revisium.io" (or the app's main sign-in entry) so
returning users are directed to the proper app entry point instead of /signup.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 1b3f4bed-9e50-4bdb-b1b8-59624f155b69
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/quick-start.md
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Addressed the CodeRabbit feedback in
There are no open review threads to resolve. |
|
|
Final local check after the alt text tweak:
|
1 participant
Summary
Notes
This is intentionally focused on the Quick Start flow, not a full documentation rewrite.
Checks
Summary by CodeRabbit