Pull Request: Comprehensive QA Suite & Interaction Documentation (#339-350)#439
Merged
Xhristin3 merged 1 commit intoApr 26, 2026
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 Description
This PR significantly hardens the teachLink smart contract by introducing a rigorous multi-layered testing strategy. We have moved from basic functional tests to a comprehensive suite that covers edge-case errors, state machine integrity, and high-concurrency safety. Additionally, we've added a developer-facing guide for interacting with the contract.
🎯 Key Changes by Issue
Path Coverage: Added tests for every panic! and Error variant in the contract.
Message Validation: Verified that error strings/codes returned to the caller match the expected failure reasons.
Valid Flows: Tested the full lifecycle of a link (e.g., Draft -> Active -> Completed).
Invariant Checks: Implemented checks to ensure that balances and ownership data remain consistent even if a transition is rejected.
Simulated Contention: Created tests that invoke the same contract function from multiple mock accounts in the same ledger footprint to verify Soroban's transaction isolation.
Locking Logic: Verified that parallel attempts to update a single "Link" resource fail gracefully or sequence correctly.
Guide: Created examples/contract_interactions.md detailing how to use the CLI and SDK to perform common operations.
Integration Patterns: Documented how to handle the error scenarios tested in #339 from a frontend/off-chain perspective.
✅ Acceptance Criteria Checklist
[x] Error Paths: 100% of defined Error enums are triggered in tests.
[x] State Integrity: Invalid transitions (e.g., jumping from Draft to Completed) are successfully rejected.
[x] Thread Safety: Concurrency tests pass without state corruption or unexpected panics.
[x] Documentation: Examples include both successful and failing transaction JSONs.
🚀 How to Verify
Run Test Suite:
Bash
cargo test --test error_scenarios_test
cargo test --test state_transitions_test
cargo test --test concurrency_test
Review Examples: Open examples/contract_interactions.md to ensure the integration patterns align with the current ABI.
🔗 Linked Issues
Closes #339,
Closes #340,
Closes #344,
Closes #350