Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-site Building Building Preview Comment Nov 24, 2025 8:59am
3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud Ignored Ignored Nov 24, 2025 8:59am
rivet-inspector Ignored Ignored Preview Nov 24, 2025 8:59am
rivetkit-serverless Skipped Skipped Nov 24, 2025 8:59am

Copy link
Member Author


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 24, 2025

PR Review: chore(blog): add live ws migration

This PR adds a blog post introducing the Live WebSocket Migration and Hibernation feature. Overall, this is well-written documentation with clear code examples.

✅ What looks good

  1. Well-structured content: The post follows a logical flow - problem statement, solution overview, and code examples
  2. Consistent metadata: The frontmatter follows the existing blog post pattern with author, published date, category, and keywords
  3. Comprehensive code examples: Both the Actions & Events API and low-level WebSocket API are covered with clear Actor + Client code pairs
  4. Proper documentation links: Links to relevant docs pages at the end of each section

📝 Suggestions (non-blocking)

  1. Line 10 - W3C compliance claim: The claim "This is fully W3C compliant" could benefit from a brief clarification of what aspect is W3C compliant (e.g., the WebSocket protocol itself, the API surface). This helps readers understand the scope of compatibility.

  2. Code example consistency: In the Actions & Events API example (line 60), c.conn.state.username is set but there's no TypeScript interface defining the connection state type. For educational purposes, adding something like:

    interface ConnState {
      username?: string;
    }

    Would help readers understand the connection state typing pattern.

  3. Error handling in examples: The low-level WebSocket example (lines 143-158) uses JSON.parse() without error handling. While this is fine for a blog post demonstrating the feature, a note about production error handling could be helpful for readers who copy this code.

  4. Missing export for actor: Both code examples define const chatRoom = actor({...}) but don't show the export statement. It might be helpful to add export default chatRoom; or show how this integrates with the registry mentioned in the client code.

✅ Verification

  • Image file (image.png) is included in the directory
  • MDX syntax appears correct for the website's CodeGroup component
  • File naming convention matches existing posts pattern

Verdict: This PR looks good to merge. The content is clear, technically accurate, and follows the existing blog post conventions. The suggestions above are minor polish items that could be addressed in a follow-up if desired.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Merge activity

  • Nov 24, 9:13 AM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Nov 24, 9:13 AM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3537) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Nov 24, 9:14 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #3537.

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Nov 24, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 11-24-chore_blog_add_live_ws_migration branch November 24, 2025 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants