Skip to content

Conversation

@MasterPtato
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

4 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud Ignored Ignored Dec 11, 2025 8:34pm
rivet-inspector Ignored Ignored Dec 11, 2025 8:34pm
rivet-site Ignored Ignored Dec 11, 2025 8:34pm
rivetkit-serverless Skipped Skipped Dec 11, 2025 8:34pm

Copy link
Contributor Author

MasterPtato commented Dec 11, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR replaces Arc<Mutex<HashSetprotocol::RequestId>> with Cache<protocol::RequestId, ()> for tracking in-flight requests. This is a good improvement that leverages Moka cache for thread-safe tracking with automatic cleanup.


Positive Changes

1. Improved Concurrency

  • Before: Used Arc<Mutex> which required acquiring a lock for all operations
  • After: Uses Cache<RequestId, ()> which provides lock-free concurrent access patterns
  • This significantly reduces lock contention when many requests are generating/releasing IDs simultaneously

2. Automatic Cleanup

  • The Moka cache will automatically evict old entries when it reaches capacity (10M entries)
  • Prevents unbounded memory growth if request IDs are leaked
  • The previous HashSet implementation had no eviction policy

3. Consistent Pattern

  • Aligns with existing code that already uses Moka caches for rate_limiters and in_flight_counters
  • Reduces cognitive overhead by using the same pattern throughout

Potential Concerns

1. Cache Eviction and ID Collision Risk

The cache is configured with max_capacity(10_000_000) but no TTL (time-to-live).

Issue: If eviction occurs before a request completes:

  1. An in-flight request ID could be evicted from the cache
  2. A new request could generate the same ID (collision)
  3. The collision would go undetected since the evicted ID is no longer in the cache

Impact: Low probability but possible under high load (approaching 10M concurrent requests).

Recommendation: Consider adding a TTL to ensure entries expire after a reasonable request timeout period. This ensures IDs are held for the expected request lifetime even if not explicitly invalidated.

2. Import Cleanup

The import collections::HashSet was removed correctly. The remaining StdHashMap is still used in the code, so the change is appropriate.

3. No Test Coverage for the Change

The PR does not include tests to verify:

  • Concurrent ID generation under load
  • ID uniqueness guarantees
  • Cache eviction behavior

Recommendation: Add integration tests that verify ID uniqueness under concurrent load.


Performance Considerations

Throughput

  • Improvement: Lock-free cache operations should improve throughput significantly
  • Moka uses advanced concurrency techniques (segmented locks internally) that scale better than a single Mutex

Memory

  • Before: HashSet - minimal overhead
  • After: Moka cache has additional overhead for LRU tracking and internal data structures
  • Verdict: Acceptable tradeoff for better concurrency

Security Considerations

No security issues identified. The change maintains the same collision detection logic and does not introduce new vulnerabilities.


Code Quality

Style

  • Follows existing patterns in the codebase
  • Clear and readable
  • Consistent with CLAUDE.md conventions

Documentation

  • No comments were needed to be updated
  • The purpose of the field is clear from context

Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Add TTL to cache to prevent premature eviction causing potential ID collisions

Medium Priority

  1. Add integration tests for concurrent request ID generation
  2. Consider metrics - track cache hit/miss rates and eviction counts for monitoring

Low Priority

  1. Document the 10M capacity choice (why this specific number?)

Verdict

Approve with suggested improvements

This is a solid improvement that reduces lock contention and aligns with existing patterns. The main concern is the lack of TTL which could lead to rare but problematic ID collisions under extreme load. Adding a TTL would make this change production-ready with high confidence.


Estimated Impact:

  • Code Quality: Improved
  • Performance: Improved (reduced lock contention)
  • Reliability: Slightly improved (automatic cleanup) but consider TTL
  • Maintainability: Improved (consistent patterns)

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 11, 2025

More templates

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3629

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3629

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3629

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3629

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3629

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3629

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3629

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3629

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3629

commit: 80ffed1

@MasterPtato MasterPtato marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2025 21:04
@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Merge activity

  • Dec 12, 12:48 AM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Dec 12, 12:49 AM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3634) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Dec 12, 12:49 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #3634.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Dec 12, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 12-11-fix_guard_use_moka_cache_for_in_flight_reqs branch December 12, 2025 00:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants