Skip to content

Conversation

@rm-hull
Copy link
Owner

@rm-hull rm-hull commented Nov 7, 2025

Replaces the boolean acceptance flag returned by TextArea with a more explicit ui.Action enum (Commit or Abort).

This refactoring:

  • Improves clarity regarding the user's intended outcome (e.g.,
    ui.Commit vs. ui.Abort).
  • Prepares the structure for easily introducing new user actions
    in the future.

Replaces the boolean acceptance flag returned by `TextArea` with a
more explicit `ui.Action` enum (`Commit` or `Abort`).

This refactoring:

*   Improves clarity regarding the user's intended outcome (e.g.,
    `ui.Commit` vs. `ui.Abort`).
*   Prepares the structure for easily introducing new user actions
    in the future.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @rm-hull, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the user interface interaction logic by replacing a generic boolean return value from the TextArea function with a more semantically meaningful ui.Action enum. This change enhances code readability by clearly indicating the user's intent (e.g., committing changes or aborting an operation) and establishes a robust foundation for incorporating additional user actions in subsequent development.

Highlights

  • Improved Clarity with Enum: The boolean acceptance flag returned by the TextArea function has been replaced with a more explicit ui.Action enum, which can be either Commit or Abort.
  • Future Extensibility: This refactoring prepares the codebase for easily introducing new user actions beyond just commit or abort in the future.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

TestsPassed ✅SkippedFailed
JUnit Test Report27 ran27 passed0 skipped0 failed
TestResult
JUnit Test Report
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestNewApp✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/NotInWorkTree✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/StagedFilesError✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/NoStagedChanges✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/DiffError✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/LLMCallError✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/TextAreaError✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/UserAborted✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/CommitError✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun/Success✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/app.TestAppRun✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/config.TestLoad/Defaults✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/config.TestLoad/WithEnvironmentVariables✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/config.TestLoad✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/llm_provider.TestNewProvider/GoogleProvider✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/llm_provider.TestNewProvider/OpenAIProvider✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/llm_provider.TestNewProvider/UnknownProvider✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/llm_provider.TestNewProvider✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/NewHistory✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Add_and_Value✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Undo✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Redo✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Undo_at_beginning✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Redo_at_end✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Add_truncates_future_history✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory/Multiple_Undos_and_Redos✅ passed
com/rm-hull/git-commit-summary/internal/ui.TestHistory✅ passed

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a great refactoring that replaces a boolean flag with a more explicit ui.Action enum. The changes are well-implemented across the codebase, including interfaces, implementations, and tests, which significantly improves code clarity and prepares for future extensions.

I have a few suggestions to further improve the robustness and maintainability of the new enum and its usage. These are minor points that build upon the excellent work already done.

Comment on lines 57 to 62
return model{
textarea: ti,
history: NewHistory(value),
accepted: false,
action: Abort,
err: nil,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Following the suggestion to make Abort the zero value for the Action enum, the explicit initialization of action to Abort becomes redundant. The action field will be implicitly initialized to its zero value.

	return model{
		textarea: ti,
		history:  NewHistory(value),
		err:      nil,
	}

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 7, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19181025309

Details

  • 2 of 14 (14.29%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 7 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 31.034%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
internal/ui/client.go 0 4 0.0%
internal/ui/text_area.go 0 8 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
internal/ui/text_area.go 1 0.0%
internal/ui/client.go 6 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19180706630: -0.6%
Covered Lines: 144
Relevant Lines: 464

💛 - Coveralls

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@rm-hull rm-hull merged commit bf1284a into main Nov 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@rm-hull rm-hull deleted the refactor/action branch November 7, 2025 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants