Change the description information of the field in /etc/shadow

[jimcat8]

…ed and intuitive

Author checklist (Completed by original Author)

• Contribution a good fit for the Rocky project? Title and Author MetaTags inserted ?
• Is this a non-English contribution?
• If applicable, steps and instructions have been tested to work on a real system
• Did you perform an initial self-review to fix basic typos and grammatical correctness

Rocky Documentation checklist (Completed by Rocky team)

• 1st Pass (Check that document is good fit for project and author checklist completed)
• 2nd Pass (Technical Review - check for technical correctness)
• 3rd Pass (Basic Editorial Review)
• 4th Pass (Detailed Editorial Review and Peer Review)
• Final pass/approval (Final Review)

[alemorvan]

These changes are very interesting.
However, beware of the pedagogical progression of the document.
All the notions you introduce are seen in the rest of the document.
You can't say everything at the same time, otherwise readers will find themselves drowning in information.

[jimcat8]

These changes are very interesting. However, beware of the pedagogical progression of the document. All the notions you introduce are seen in the rest of the document. You can't say everything at the same time, otherwise readers will find themselves drowning in information.

My personal view is to emphasize these documents repeatedly to deepen the impression of beginners. Since classification is a books, it shouldn't be so bad to write more detailed information! Of course, I have no right to decide whether to merge or not.

[alemorvan]

You are not wrong!
I add my thumb.