Feature description
Would it be possible to add the public accessor to RooPlot::_hist member?
or, alternatively, provide copy-constructor for RooPlot class ?
It looks like simple action - just one pubilc inline function.
The action is 100% backward compatible, safe and should not break any existing code.
Alternatives considered
Suitable alternative (for my purpose) is the existence of enabled pubilc copy constructor for class RooPlot, that is currently explicitely disabled.
Howeevr I suspect that this alternative solutino could be more complicated - Likely there are some good reasons to disable it. e.g. related to the ownership of RooCurve/RooHist/TH1/... objects..
Additional context
No response
Feature description
Would it be possible to add the public accessor to
RooPlot::_histmember?or, alternatively, provide copy-constructor for
RooPlotclass ?It looks like simple action - just one pubilc inline function.
The action is 100% backward compatible, safe and should not break any existing code.
Alternatives considered
Suitable alternative (for my purpose) is the existence of enabled pubilc copy constructor for class
RooPlot, that is currently explicitely disabled.Howeevr I suspect that this alternative solutino could be more complicated - Likely there are some good reasons to disable it. e.g. related to the ownership of RooCurve/RooHist/TH1/... objects..
Additional context
No response