Revert "[clang] Mark ContentCache as invalid if !Buffer:"#12454
Revert "[clang] Mark ContentCache as invalid if !Buffer:"#12454hahnjo wants to merge 1 commit intoroot-project:masterfrom
Conversation
This reverts commit 8deb57c and fixes the Cling test CodeUnloading/Macros.C that was previously failing with complaints that the unloaded and then re-included Macros.h header had no lines 18 and 19.
|
Starting build on |
|
@Axel-Naumann this was done during the huge upgrade PR to LLVM 13, do you remember which problem it was supposed to address? The commit message is somewhat scarce on details... (the |
|
I don't remember in which case we call |
|
Javier is fixing the test in #12855 by moving the diagnostics checks to the re-included header. |
Clang diagnostic verification was unhappy with the previous state of affairs. Move affected `expected-(warning|note)` markers to `Macros.h`. Apparently, as Jonas Hahnfeld found, this failure originated in commit 8deb57c, but is not to be reverted per discussion in root-project#12454.
Clang diagnostic verification was unhappy with the previous state of affairs. Move affected `expected-(warning|note)` markers to `Macros.h`. Apparently, as Jonas Hahnfeld found, this failure originated in commit 8deb57c, but is not to be reverted per discussion in root-project#12454.
Clang diagnostic verification was unhappy with the previous state of affairs. Move affected `expected-(warning|note)` markers to `Macros.h`. Apparently, as Jonas Hahnfeld found, this failure originated in commit 8deb57c04a5ceea96533d095092fcd4f71d1df94, but is not to be reverted per discussion in root-project/root#12454.
Clang diagnostic verification was unhappy with the previous state of affairs. Move affected `expected-(warning|note)` markers to `Macros.h`. Apparently, as Jonas Hahnfeld found, this failure originated in commit 8deb57c, but is not to be reverted per discussion in root-project#12454.
Clang diagnostic verification was unhappy with the previous state of affairs. Move affected `expected-(warning|note)` markers to `Macros.h`. Apparently, as Jonas Hahnfeld found, this failure originated in commit 8deb57c, but is not to be reverted per discussion in root-project#12454.
This reverts commit 8deb57c and fixes the Cling test
CodeUnloading/Macros.Cthat was previously failing with complaints that the unloaded and then re-includedMacros.hheader had no lines 18 and 19.