Skip to content

Conversation

@dpiparo
Copy link
Member

@dpiparo dpiparo commented Jan 17, 2026

This will compensate for the slowness of the runners.

@dpiparo dpiparo requested a review from guitargeek January 17, 2026 16:17
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Test Results

2 511 tests   2 511 ✅  3h 57m 1s ⏱️
    1 suites      0 💤
    1 files        0 ❌

Results for commit 3bef1cf.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@dpiparo dpiparo added the clean build Ask CI to do non-incremental build on PR label Jan 18, 2026
@dpiparo dpiparo self-assigned this Jan 18, 2026
@guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor

Interesting idea! I have two questions:

  • Can this PR maybe wait for [cppyy] Review xfail'ed tests #20906? I'm doing a large-scale review of which cppyy tests are actually passing on which platforms, so it would be good to keep the full mac14 configuration until this is done. I could revert your proposed change in that PR for testing, but then I still would not have a complete mac14 reference in the nightlies and might not be able to tell apart failures in my PR from potential regressions in master.
  • What's the strategy for the release branches, including the upcoming 6.40 branch? We enable the full build there?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clean build Ask CI to do non-incremental build on PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants