Skip to content

[6.40] [RDF] Always write nominal columns in Snapshot with variations.#22089

Merged
hageboeck merged 2 commits intoroot-project:v6-40-00-patchesfrom
root-project-bot:BP_6.40_pull_21246
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

[6.40] [RDF] Always write nominal columns in Snapshot with variations.#22089
hageboeck merged 2 commits intoroot-project:v6-40-00-patchesfrom
root-project-bot:BP_6.40_pull_21246

Conversation

@root-project-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Backport of #21246, requested by @hageboeck.

Before, the nominal columns were omitted from the output if their filter
didn't pass. This is, however, insufficient, because if at least two
variations are run, (some of) the nominal columns might still be in use.

The tests have been updated to reflect the fact that the nominal columns
are not zeroed out.

(cherry picked from commit 2bf9cbb)
When two variations are run, e.g. x_var and y_var, and the computation
graph uses both x and y, the pairs {x, y_var} and {x_var, y} need to be
visible in the output file. This means that the nominal columsn always
need to be written, even if {x, y} would not pass the filter.

(cherry picked from commit 6ce7930)
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

    22 files      22 suites   3d 8h 42m 23s ⏱️
 3 850 tests  3 850 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
76 005 runs  76 005 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit a9c34e2.

@hageboeck hageboeck merged commit a661d7e into root-project:v6-40-00-patches Apr 29, 2026
33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants