Expected handling of publishing for "Whats New" metadata #1469
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
|
Good question; will let you know tomorrow |
|
The current I can review the PR adding I would not restore I also wouldn’t make |
|
This was addressed in #1485 and released in version 1.4.0. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I'm trying to one-shot the publish with the
asc publish appstorecommand, but I end up getting an error back that I'm missing the "Whats New" metadata.What is the expected workflow to avoid this? Use
asc release stage? I thought the point of consolidation into theasc publish appstorecommand was to streamline those steps. If there were aasc submitcommand for starting a new review submissions, I'd add some error handling, but it seems from the docs like this has been intentionally omitted and steering folks towardsasc publishinstead.I also see in the error message to call
asc publish appstore --submita second time. That errors out with:FYI - I'm explicitly supplying an explicit
--build-numberparam, because I check that value into source code for tracking purposes. I think that makes my workflow non-standard and in the standard flow (and not using the--ipaparam here), it would just bump the version number, rebuild, and submit another build (which is a bit wasteful, but probably not a huge deal).Would you be willing to take a
--metadata-dirparam on the publish command and have that be set that right afterpublishPlanStepEnsureVersion? Or alternatively allowasc release stageto operate without a--buildparam, which would just run theensure_versionandapply_metadataactions?Thanks!
All reactions