Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add design document for ROS 2 Access Control Policies #246

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

ruffsl
Copy link
Member

@ruffsl ruffsl commented Jul 26, 2019

As currently used for SROS 2.

@ruffsl
Copy link
Member Author

ruffsl commented Aug 26, 2019

If there is no more feedback, perhaps we could merge on this, that reflects the current state, so that we can open a new PR to extend the design to account for proposals on composing nodes and contexts.
e.g: #250 (comment)

@kyrofa @tfoote

Copy link
Member

@jacobperron jacobperron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some wording suggestions.

Content seems reasonable.

articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
articles/ros2_access_control_policies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ruffsl
Copy link
Member Author

ruffsl commented Aug 27, 2019

@jacobperron , thanks for the wording suggestions. They all looked fine to me.

Copy link
Member

@kyrofa kyrofa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a good reflection of where things stand today.

@jacobperron
Copy link
Member

The change to the CSS is unrelated to the SROS article and I think would be best to pull out into a separate PR to review.

ruffsl and others added 5 commits August 26, 2019 19:21
Co-Authored-By: Kyle Fazzari <github@status.e4ward.com>
Co-Authored-By: Daniel Wang <daniel.wang@canonical.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jacob Perron <jacob@openrobotics.org>
@ruffsl ruffsl force-pushed the ros2_access_control_policies branch from 90fd411 to 23726b4 Compare August 27, 2019 02:25
@ruffsl
Copy link
Member Author

ruffsl commented Aug 27, 2019

I think would be best to pull out into a separate PR to review.

I've rebased the PR and opened the syntax highlighting changes to its own PR: #253

@jacobperron
Copy link
Member

Thanks for splitting out the PR. LGTM

@jacobperron jacobperron merged commit 3f33a66 into ros2:gh-pages Aug 27, 2019
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants