Adding method to remove and add nodes to bbox spatial filter

[JoOkuma]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.95402% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.32%. Comparing base (2bf5cb1) to head (f3bc4d7).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/tracksdata/graph/filters/_spatial_filter.py	81.08%	3 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #159      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.27%   88.32%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          51       52       +1     
  Lines        3692     3769      +77     
  Branches      641      656      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         3259     3329      +70     
- Misses        260      263       +3     
- Partials      173      177       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[TeunHuijben]

LGTM!

Sorry for the mess with merging other branches and main into this one,

[JoOkuma]

@TeunHuijben , just to double check, even though you approved the PR.
Should we wait to see if there's anything else to add here with your recent work?

[TeunHuijben]

If it is blocking anything else, go ahead and merge it, because I haven't encountered anything so far. Otherwise, give me two days to properly check all functionalities :)

[JoOkuma]

@TeunHuijben, I'll leave this open and take your time

[TeunHuijben]

@JoOkuma, two changes:

• node_{removed/added} signals in GraphView emit on the graph itself, not the _root (as we discussed)
• added BBoxSpatialFilter._note_tree creation in it's add_node method when the filter was initialized with an empty graph, including test. (this should have been a separate PR I realize now, sorry!)

[yfukai]

Maybe we should revive this? I have a similar kind of need.

[JoOkuma]

Hey @yfukai,

I merged with main.
Can you test if this works for you? And what else is needed?

[yfukai]

This looks great to me thanks @JoOkuma and @TeunHuijben !

[JoOkuma]

I'm going to merge this. We can always revisit the implementation and make adjustments for improvement.
Thank you, @TeunHuijben, for the help.