Skip to content

Conversation

@rdegnan
Copy link
Member

@rdegnan rdegnan commented Oct 1, 2018

This resolves #532

@rdegnan rdegnan requested review from nebhale and yschimke October 1, 2018 21:14
Copy link
Member

@nebhale nebhale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solid improvement. Apparently more improvements to come in 0.9.

.receive()
.map(AbstractionLeakingFrameUtils::fromAbstractionLeakingFrame)
.concatMap(function(this::toReassembledFrames));
.concatMap(t2 -> toReassembledFrames(t2.getT1(), t2.getT2()));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes me sad, but I get it.

Copy link
Member

@yschimke yschimke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a great cleanup

@yschimke yschimke merged commit 9b6609f into rsocket:1.0.x Oct 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants