chore: fix lint issues

[chenjiahan]

Summary

This PR fixes the current lint failures by replacing ts-comment suppressions with typed alternatives, adding a minimal local declaration for the rspack hot modules, and removing the unused getChildLogger plumbing.

Testing

• pnpm lint
• pnpm build

Related Links

• None

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR resolves current lint failures by removing TypeScript suppression comments and replacing them with typed alternatives, plus a small cleanup in the client logger plumbing.

Changes:

• Replaced @ts-ignore / @ts-expect-error suppressions with explicit typing/casts and updated an ANSI escape regex to a TS-safe form.
• Added local TypeScript module declarations for @rspack/core/hot/* imports used by the client runtime.
• Simplified the client logger implementation by removing unused getChildLogger plumbing and tightening a stub hook implementation.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
tests/normalizeOptions.test.ts	Removes TS suppression comments by using a typed cast for snapshot normalization.
src/server.ts	Minor refactor (let → const) in client transport selection to satisfy linting/immutability expectations.
client-src/utils/ansiHTML.ts	Replaces octal escape sequence with \x1b to avoid TS parsing/lint issues.
client-src/rspack-hot.d.ts	Adds minimal local module declarations for rspack HMR emitter/log imports.
client-src/modules/logger/Logger.ts	Renames internals to “Rspack” and removes unused child logger wiring.
client-src/modules/logger/index.ts	Updates SyncBailHook stub to a class and removes now-unused child logger creation path.
client-src/index.ts	Switches to the locally-declared rspack hot log import name and updates usage accordingly.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e62569e5ea

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".