chore: release 0.4.20

[SyMind]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request performs a routine version bump for the rspack_sources package, updating it to 0.4.20. This ensures that all project dependencies reflect the latest release version.

Highlights

• Version Update: The rspack_sources package has been updated from version 0.4.19 to 0.4.20.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• Cargo.lock
  • Updated the rspack_sources package version to 0.4.20.
• Cargo.toml
  • Updated the rspack_sources package version to 0.4.20.

Activity

• No specific activity (comments, reviews, etc.) was provided in the context for this pull request.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the package version from 0.4.19 to 0.4.20 in Cargo.toml and Cargo.lock. These changes are consistent with preparing a new release. I have reviewed the changes and have no further comments.

_{Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Bumps the rspack_sources crate version for the 0.4.20 release, keeping Cargo.toml and Cargo.lock in sync.

Changes:

• Update crate version from 0.4.19 to 0.4.20 in Cargo.toml
• Update corresponding rspack_sources entry in Cargo.lock to 0.4.20

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
Cargo.toml	Updates package version to 0.4.20 for the release.
Cargo.lock	Aligns the locked rspack_sources package version to 0.4.20.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 11 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 7 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing release/v0.4.20 (8ce75e5) with main (74b99ff)}

Footnotes

1. 7 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩