Skip to content

Review inspection types #5723

@retailcoder

Description

@retailcoder

New inspections default to CodeQualityIssues if I recall correctly, and because it's easy to forget to review/set the InspectionType when creating a new inspection, many aren't under the right/intended category.

We need to review all inspection types, and perhaps...

  • Rename MaintenanceAndReadability to NamingAndConventions
  • Add a Performance inspection type
  • Add a Miscellaneous or Uncategorized inspection type and make it the default to compel proper/explicit categorization

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    development-issueIssues encountered while developing RD, not in RD itselfdifficulty-01-ducklingIssue where no particularly involved knowledge of the internal API is needed.enhancementFeature requests, or enhancements to existing features. Ideas. Anything within the project's scope.feature-inspectionsup-for-grabsUse this label in conjunction with a difficulty level label, e.g. difficulty-02-duckyuser-experienceIssue relates to user experience (workflow, flexibility, customisation)

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions