Skip to content

Conversation

@marocchino
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was intentional - you can bind the resulting value to any variable name.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not notice that.

@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Dec 3, 2014

Let me know when the PR is updated.

@marocchino
Copy link
Contributor Author

I do not have permission to reopen PR.

_<

anyway, how about this?

@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Dec 3, 2014

I don't think that the extra comment is needed. Just fixing the first variable name is enough.

@marocchino marocchino mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2014
@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Dec 4, 2014

What about the other part of this PR? (about ...)

@marocchino
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think It is not needed because there is similar PR (#381).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants