Skip to content

Conversation

@no-reply
Copy link
Member

This was introduced in 22d6fea, leading up to the 1.99 release.

This conditional is apparently untested; apparently we never try to
#update on a single statement throughout the suite. I'm working on a
test to catch this.

I believe we should merge this immediately, since it is a simple typo
fix. Any issues revealed in adding #update testing can be dealt with
as an issue unrelated to the typo.

This was introduced in 22d6fea, leading up to the 1.99 release.

This conditional is apparently untested; apparently we never try to
`#update` on a single statement throughout the suite. I'm working on a
test to catch this.

I believe we should merge this immediately, since it is a simple typo
fix. Any issues revealed in adding `#update` testing can be dealt with
as an issue unrelated to the typo.
no-reply pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2015
Fix a typo (`Enummerable`) in `RDF::Mutable`
@no-reply no-reply merged commit 476c42b into develop Dec 29, 2015
@no-reply no-reply deleted the feature/mutable-typo branch December 29, 2015 02:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants