Skip to content

Claude/audit docs blogs l2gsm#116

Merged
amavashev merged 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/audit-docs-blogs-L2gsm
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

Claude/audit docs blogs l2gsm#116
amavashev merged 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/audit-docs-blogs-L2gsm

Conversation

@amavashev
Copy link
Contributor

All pushed. Here's the final status across all 3 commits:

Total fixes: 23 edits across 14 files (9 blog posts + 5 concept docs)

Category Files Fixed Status
Scope hierarchy (non-spec terms) 11 files Fixed
"reconcile" → "commit" 1 file Fixed
DENY vs HTTP 409 semantics 2 files Fixed
Fabricated pseudocode enums 1 file Fixed
dimensions v0 caveat 1 file Fixed
Blog cross-links (below target) 2 files Fixed
Broken internal link 1 file Fixed

All remaining "per-run" references in the docs are conceptual usage (e.g., "a per-run budget of $15") describing the user-facing capability, not claiming "run" is a protocol scope level. Those are accurate — you can implement per-run budgets via the dimensions field or agent scoping.

claude added 2 commits March 20, 2026 18:59
- Add missing 'app' level to scope hierarchies that listed
  tenant > workspace > workflow > agent (should include app)
- Fix cycles-vs-rate-limiting.md: per-run → per-agent
- Fix cycles-vs-provider-spending-caps.md: full canonical hierarchy
- Fix how-cycles-compares.md: add workspace to hierarchy
- Fix ai-agent-failures blog: add app to hierarchy
- Fix ai-agent-cost-management-guide: add app to hierarchy

Canonical spec hierarchy: tenant > workspace > app > workflow > agent > toolset

https://claude.ai/code/session_01NEcAqmfZHsZV9WEZXNofWY
Replace non-spec scope terms in tables and lists that present
them as Cycles scope levels:
- cycles-vs-guardrails-ai.md: per-run → per-agent in table
- how-cycles-compares.md: per-run/per-action → per-workspace/per-agent
- cycles-vs-provider-spending-caps.md: per-run → per-agent
- cycles-vs-llm-proxies blog: per-run → per-agent in table

https://claude.ai/code/session_01NEcAqmfZHsZV9WEZXNofWY
@amavashev amavashev merged commit 0eb0993 into main Mar 20, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants