fix: isolate publish path from setup-channel closures (#30)

src/core/RunMQ.ts

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ export class RunMQ {
     private readonly logger: RunMQLogger
     private retryAttempts: number = 0;
     private defaultChannel: AMQPChannel | undefined;
+    private publishChannel: AMQPChannel | undefined;
 
     private constructor(config: RunMQConnectionConfig, logger: RunMQLogger) {
         this.logger = logger;
@@ -62,14 +63,14 @@ export class RunMQ {
      * @param correlationId (Optional) A unique identifier for correlating messages; if not provided, a new UUID will be generated
      */
     public publish(topic: string, message: Record<string, any>, correlationId: string = RunMQUtils.generateUUID()): void {
-        if (!this.publisher || !this.defaultChannel) {
+        if (!this.publisher || !this.publishChannel) {
             throw new RunMQException(Exceptions.NOT_INITIALIZED, {});
         }
         RunMQUtils.assertRecord(message);
         this.publisher.publish(topic,
             RabbitMQMessage.from(
                 message,
-                this.defaultChannel,
+                this.publishChannel,
                 new RabbitMQMessageProperties(RunMQUtils.generateUUID(), correlationId)
             )
         );
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ export class RunMQ {
         this.defaultChannel = await this.client.getDefaultChannel();
         await this.defaultChannel.assertExchange(Constants.ROUTER_EXCHANGE_NAME, 'direct', {durable: true});
         await this.defaultChannel.assertExchange(Constants.DEAD_LETTER_ROUTER_EXCHANGE_NAME, 'direct', {durable: true});
+        // Use a dedicated channel for publishes so a setup-time channel close
+        // (e.g. a precondition_failed on assertQueue) cannot break the publish path.
+        this.publishChannel = await this.client.getChannel();
         this.publisher = new RunMQPublisherCreator(this.logger).createPublisher();
     }
 }

src/core/clients/RabbitMQClientAdapter.ts

@@ -128,7 +128,13 @@ export class RabbitMQClientAdapter implements AMQPClient {
 
     public async getDefaultChannel(): Promise<AMQPChannel> {
         if (!this.defaultChannel) {
-            this.defaultChannel = await this.getChannel();
+            this.defaultChannel = await this.getChannel({
+                onClose: () => {
+                    // Drop the cached reference so the next getDefaultChannel()
+                    // re-acquires a live channel — the previous one is dead.
+                    this.defaultChannel = undefined;
+                },
+            });
         }
         return this.defaultChannel;
     }

tests/e2e/RunMQ.publishChannel.e2e.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+import {RunMQ} from '@src/core/RunMQ';
+import {RabbitMQClientAdapter} from "@src/core/clients/RabbitMQClientAdapter";
+import {Constants} from "@src/core/constants";
+import {ChannelTestHelpers} from "@tests/helpers/ChannelTestHelpers";
+import {RunMQUtils} from "@src/core/utils/RunMQUtils";
+import {MockedRunMQLogger} from "@tests/mocks/MockedRunMQLogger";
+import {RunMQConnectionConfigExample} from "@tests/Examples/RunMQConnectionConfigExample";
+import {RunMQProcessorConfigurationExample} from "@tests/Examples/RunMQProcessorConfigurationExample";
+
+describe('RunMQ Publish Channel Isolation E2E', () => {
+    const validConfig = RunMQConnectionConfigExample.valid();
+    const testingConnection = new RabbitMQClientAdapter(validConfig);
+
+    afterAll(async () => {
+        await testingConnection.disconnect();
+    });
+
+    it('should keep publishing working after a setup-channel close from a precondition_failed', async () => {
+        const queueName = 'publish_channel_isolation_queue';
+        const topic = 'publish.channel.isolation';
+
+        const setupChannel = await testingConnection.getChannel();
+        await ChannelTestHelpers.deleteQueue(setupChannel, queueName);
+
+        // Pre-declare the queue with one set of arguments. A later assertQueue
+        // with conflicting arguments will trigger PRECONDITION_FAILED, which
+        // RabbitMQ resolves by closing the offending channel.
+        await setupChannel.assertQueue(queueName, {
+            durable: true,
+            messageTtl: 60_000,
+        });
+
+        const runMQ = await RunMQ.start(validConfig, MockedRunMQLogger);
+
+        // Trigger a precondition failure on the consumer-setup channel by
+        // declaring a processor whose queue name collides with the existing
+        // queue but whose args differ. This must NOT take the publish channel
+        // down with it.
+        const conflictingConfig = RunMQProcessorConfigurationExample.simpleNoSchema(queueName);
+        await expect(
+            runMQ.process(topic, conflictingConfig, async () => {})
+        ).rejects.toBeDefined();
+
+        // Give the broker a moment to actually close the setup channel.
+        await RunMQUtils.delay(300);
+
+        // Set up a fresh consumer on a different queue, on a different topic,
+        // so we have a place for the publish to land.
+        const verifyQueue = 'publish_channel_isolation_verify';
+        const verifyTopic = 'publish.channel.isolation.verify';
+        await ChannelTestHelpers.deleteQueue(setupChannel, verifyQueue);
+        const verifyConfig = RunMQProcessorConfigurationExample.simpleNoSchema(verifyQueue);
+        const received: any[] = [];
+        await runMQ.process(verifyTopic, verifyConfig, async (msg) => {
+            received.push(msg);
+        });
+
+        // The crux of the test: publish() must still work even though the
+        // setup channel was closed by the prior precondition_failed.
+        runMQ.publish(verifyTopic, {ok: true});
+
+        await RunMQUtils.delay(500);
+        expect(received.length).toBe(1);
+
+        await ChannelTestHelpers.deleteQueue(setupChannel, queueName);
+        await ChannelTestHelpers.deleteQueue(setupChannel, verifyQueue);
+        await runMQ.disconnect();
+    }, 30000);
+
+    it('should also publish via a channel distinct from getDefaultChannel', async () => {
+        const runMQ = await RunMQ.start(validConfig, MockedRunMQLogger);
+
+        // Publishing immediately after start should not throw and should not
+        // depend on the setup channel — covered by the first test, but this
+        // case asserts the simple happy-path wiring still works.
+        const queueName = 'publish_channel_smoke';
+        const topic = 'publish.channel.smoke';
+
+        const setupChannel = await testingConnection.getChannel();
+        await ChannelTestHelpers.deleteQueue(setupChannel, queueName);
+
+        const config = RunMQProcessorConfigurationExample.simpleNoSchema(queueName);
+        const received: any[] = [];
+        await runMQ.process(topic, config, async (msg) => {
+            received.push(msg);
+        });
+
+        runMQ.publish(topic, {ok: true});
+        await RunMQUtils.delay(500);
+        expect(received.length).toBe(1);
+
+        await ChannelTestHelpers.deleteQueue(setupChannel, queueName);
+        await runMQ.disconnect();
+    }, 15000);
+});