This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2023. It is now read-only.
test failures with Rust 1.57 #4
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
bugNot as expectedNot as expected
Description
Hello, attempting to build concolor-control@0.0.7 on Guix, I get the following test failure:
starting phase `check'
Compiling concolor-control v0.0.7 (/tmp/guix-build-rust-concolor-control-0.0.7.drv-0/concolor-control-0.0.7)
Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.21s
Running unittests (target/debug/deps/concolor_control-862b70130982a923)
running 0 tests
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
Doc-tests concolor-control
running 2 tests
test src/lib.rs - (line 31) ... FAILED
test src/lib.rs - (line 62) ... ok
failures:
---- src/lib.rs - (line 31) stdout ----
error[E0425]: cannot find function `set` in crate `concolor_control`
--> src/lib.rs:33:19
|
5 | concolor_control::set(when);
| ^^^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `get`
|
::: /tmp/guix-build-rust-concolor-control-0.0.7.drv-0/concolor-control-0.0.7/src/no_color.rs:21:1
|
21 | pub fn get(_stream: crate::Stream) -> Color {
| ------------------------------------------- similarly named function `get` defined here
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
Couldn't compile the test.
failures:
src/lib.rs - (line 31)
test result: FAILED. 1 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.15s
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--doc'
error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "cargo" arguments: ("test") exit-status: 101 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
phase `check' failed after 0.4 seconds
It is probably related the doctest problem (?) in Rust 1.57 that also causes xiph/rav1e#2851.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
bugNot as expectedNot as expected