netbsd: restore getmntinfo link symbol.

[fraggerfox]

Description

Restore the link symbol for getmntinfo accidentally reverted in 1816f6061

• More details in this discussion netbsd: Fix statvfs struct layout and add symbol versioning for NetBSD 10.x #5243 (comment)

Sources

• __getmntinfo13 implementation: https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/b28c8b71e96a8bf47113b3e31dcb078887e82f01/lib/libc/compat/gen/compat___getmntinfo13.c
• statvfs struct: https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/b28c8b71e96a8bf47113b3e31dcb078887e82f01/sys/compat/sys/statvfs.h#L37

Checklist

• Relevant tests in libc-test/semver have been updated
  • Not applicable.
• No placeholder or unstable values like *LAST or *MAX are
  included (see #3131)
  • Not applicable.
• Tested locally (cd libc-test && cargo test --target mytarget);
  especially relevant for platforms that may not be checked in CI

@rustbot label +stable-nominated

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in a NetBSD-like module

cc @semarie

[tgross35]

I'll wait on @0323pin to ack but this LGTM, thank you and sorry for the confusion.

Were you able to test whether this fixes bottom?

View changes since this review

[fraggerfox]

Were you able to test whether this fixes bottom?

bottom builds and runs, but the Disks panel is empty, I will need to investigate why it is failing to fetch the data.

[fraggerfox]

Were you able to test whether this fixes bottom?

bottom builds and runs, but the Disks panel is empty, I will need to investigate why it is failing to fetch the data.

@tgross35 : They are showing up correctly. In my previous attempt I was in the wrong branch and compiled the wrong code.

[0323pin]

I'll wait on @0323pin to ack but this LGTM, thank you and sorry for the confusion.

Were you able to test whether this fixes bottom?

View changes since this review

I think I'm fine with this.
@fraggerfox was your test on 10 or, 11?

[fraggerfox]

I'll wait on @0323pin to ack but this LGTM, thank you and sorry for the confusion.
Were you able to test whether this fixes bottom?
View changes since this review

I think I'm fine with this. @fraggerfox was your test on 10 or, 11?

This was on 10.