Skip to content

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Rough timeline:

  • The longer .content .item-info selector originated in 110e727. No reason seems to be given in the PR why it needed the .content part, but it was probably added because of
    .content .impl-items .docblock, .content .impl-items .stability {
    margin-bottom: .6em;
    }
    . That selector with the margin-bottom was removed when CSS containment was added in 8846c08.
  • .stability was renamed .item-info in caf6c57.
  • The selector without the .content was added in d48a39a.

Rough timeline:

* The longer `.content .item-info` selector originated in
  110e727. No reason seems to be given in
  the PR why it needed the `.content` part, but it was probably added because
  of <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/110e7270ab7b0700ce714b8b1c7e509195dea2c4/src/librustdoc/html/static/rustdoc.css#L476-L478>.
  That selector with the margin-bottom was removed when CSS containment
  was added in 8846c08.
* `.stability` was renamed `.item-info` in
  caf6c57.
* The selector without the `.content` was added in
  d48a39a.
@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 12, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 12, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @CraftSpider (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 12, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 12, 2022

📌 Commit f8da229 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 12, 2022
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2022
…llaumeGomez

rustdoc: merge separate `.item-info` CSS

Rough timeline:

* The longer `.content .item-info` selector originated in 110e727. No reason seems to be given in the PR why it needed the `.content` part, but it was probably added because of <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/110e7270ab7b0700ce714b8b1c7e509195dea2c4/src/librustdoc/html/static/rustdoc.css#L476-L478>. That selector with the margin-bottom was removed when CSS containment was added in 8846c08.
* `.stability` was renamed `.item-info` in caf6c57.
* The selector without the `.content` was added in d48a39a.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102641 (Support casting boxes to dyn*)
 - rust-lang#102836 (rustc_target: Fix json target specs using LLD linker flavors in link args)
 - rust-lang#102949 (should-skip-this: add missing backslash)
 - rust-lang#102967 (Add test for issue 102964)
 - rust-lang#102971 (tidy: error if a lang feature is already present)
 - rust-lang#102974 (Fix small word dupe typos)
 - rust-lang#102980 (rustdoc: merge separate `.item-info` CSS)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e802936 into rust-lang:master Oct 13, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 13, 2022
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/content branch October 13, 2022 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants