Skip to content

Conversation

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

@sfackler sfackler commented Dec 3, 2013

It's a more fitting name for the most common use case of this function.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I think that we want to remove std::util, and there was talk of moving this function to the prelude directly.

I don't think we ever had an official consensus, but now may be as good a time as any. Do others have opinions on moving this function to the prelude? (I would be in favor).

@liigo
Copy link
Contributor

liigo commented Dec 3, 2013

+1

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

pcwalton commented Dec 3, 2013

+1 on everything suggested by @alexcrichton

It's a more fitting name for the most common use case of this function.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2013
It's a more fitting name for the most common use case of this function.
@bors bors closed this Dec 4, 2013
@bors bors merged commit a243360 into rust-lang:master Dec 4, 2013
@sfackler sfackler deleted the drop branch December 23, 2013 03:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants