Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #123299

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 31, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #123299

merged 10 commits into from
Mar 31, 2024

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Contributor

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Oneirical and others added 10 commits March 30, 2024 19:40
Rewrite core-no-fp-fmt-parse in Rust

fix: missing import

fix: tidiness check

more tidy checks

remove tidy line length ignore

new helper functions + arg_path generic

fix: remove unused import

delete arg_path, change arg_path to input
Implementation note: The most probable place for users to find
the documentation is at https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/trait.SliceIndex.html

On that page, documentation added to specific methods will not
be visible. As such, I opted to add the comments to the impl blocks
directly.

Helps with rust-lang#121568.
Rewrite `core-no-fp-fmt-parse` test in Rust

Claiming the simple "core-no-fp-fmt-parse" test from rust-lang#121876. `run_make_support` was altered with `arg_path` written in rust-lang#121918 by `@abhay-51,` with additional doc comment.

Preliminary GSoC contribution for the project proposal mentored by `@jieyouxu.`
…joboet

std::thread: adding get_name haiku implementation.

follow-up rust-lang#123233
warn against implementing Freeze

As [requested](rust-lang#123184 (comment)) by `@workingjubilee`
…trieb

doc: describe panic conditions for SliceIndex implementations

Implementation note: The most probable place for users to find the documentation is at https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/trait.SliceIndex.html

On that page, documentation added to specific methods will not be visible. As such, I opted to add the comments to the impl blocks directly.

Helps with rust-lang#121568.
…ark-Simulacrum

add myself to compiler review rotation

title
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 31, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2024

📌 Commit f7d0a59 has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 31, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit f7d0a59 with merge 8058136...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: workingjubilee
Pushing 8058136 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 31, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 8058136 into rust-lang:master Mar 31, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 31, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#123180 Rewrite core-no-fp-fmt-parse test in Rust 004af8a5c422696d8afc39b4a04f4f7fed677146 (link)
#123267 std::thread: adding get_name haiku implementation. 9ad6728a7bd4051a4f9704157398a01d5b43f31a (link)
#123268 warn against implementing Freeze 9ac07edfd5a193b02b0139d8cd594776601dae61 (link)
#123271 doc: describe panic conditions for SliceIndex implementatio… 1aecd1b1aef8792757a7cbd80abe858a3ffcf299 (link)
#123295 add myself to compiler review rotation da7feefed762f164b5f556d726c6c29f18dae43e (link)

previous master: 204805a092

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (8058136): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 669.024s -> 667.771s (-0.19%)
Artifact size: 315.68 MiB -> 315.70 MiB (0.01%)

@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the rollup-2z8amaj branch April 1, 2024 05:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. O-unix Operating system: Unix-like rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants