rustdoc: Fix passes order so intra-doc links are collected after stripping passes #147809
+58
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
|
23 tasks
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
fix-rustdoc-passes
branch
from
a0c8a00 to
b3bb750
Compare
|
CI passed. ^^' |
fmease
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2025
|
Thanks for the quick review! @bors r=fmease rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2025
… r=fmease rustdoc: Fix passes order so intra-doc links are collected after stripping passes Fixes regression I introduced in rust-lang#147153. This PR puts back the intra-doc link collecting pass after the stripping items pass, preventing lints to be emitted on non-visible items. Although, might be nice to add a way to change this behaviour. To be discussed later on. cc `@ojeda` r? `@fmease`
fmease
reviewed
Oct 17, 2025
| ConditionalPass::new(STRIP_PRIVATE, WhenNotDocumentPrivate), | ||
| ConditionalPass::new(STRIP_PRIV_IMPORTS, WhenDocumentPrivate), | ||
| ConditionalPass::always(COLLECT_INTRA_DOC_LINKS), | ||
| ConditionalPass::always(PROPAGATE_DOC_CFG), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now, could you move the PROPAGATE_DOC_CFG pass somewhere above the STRIP_* ones to address #138907 (comment) and revert the change to tests/rustdoc-ui/invalid-cfg.rs you made in #138907 (i.e., make it private again and add an explanation) or do you want to do it in another PR?
My open PR #146529 is kinda blocked cuz I wanted to wait for all of these fixes ^^'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Discussed elsewhere, it's gonna be done in a separate PR
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2025
… r=fmease rustdoc: Fix passes order so intra-doc links are collected after stripping passes Fixes regression I introduced in rust-lang#147153. This PR puts back the intra-doc link collecting pass after the stripping items pass, preventing lints to be emitted on non-visible items. Although, might be nice to add a way to change this behaviour. To be discussed later on. cc `@ojeda` r? `@fmease`
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #140153 (Implement `Debug` for `EncodeWide`) - #147454 (Fix backtraces with `-C panic=abort` on qnx; emit unwind tables by default) - #147468 (Implement fs api set_times and set_times_nofollow) - #147494 (std::thread spawn: Docs: Link to Builder::spawn; Make same.) - #147783 (bootstrap: migrate to object 0.37) - #147792 (Fix autodiff incorrectly applying fat-lto to proc-macro crates ) - #147809 (rustdoc: Fix passes order so intra-doc links are collected after stripping passes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes regression I introduced in #147153.
This PR puts back the intra-doc link collecting pass after the stripping items pass, preventing lints to be emitted on non-visible items.
Although, might be nice to add a way to change this behaviour. To be discussed later on.
cc @ojeda
r? @fmease