Skip to content

resolve: Preserve ambiguous glob reexports in crate metadata #147984

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

resolve: Preserve ambiguous glob reexports in crate metadata #147984

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented Oct 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

So in cross-crate scenarios they can work in the same way as in crate-local scenarios.

TODO: crater run and description for lang team.

Resurrection of #114682.
One of unblocking steps for #145108.
Fixes #36837.

@petrochenkov
resolve: Preserve ambiguous glob reexports in crate metadata
0a6d58a 
So in cross-crate scenarios they can work in the same way as in crate-local scenarios.
@petrochenkov
report everything as an error for crater
aa2fb6e
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 22, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 22, 2025

r? @jdonszelmann

rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
@rust-bors
Auto merge of #147984 - petrochenkov:expambig, r=<try>
b4c5508 
resolve: Preserve ambiguous glob reexports in crate metadata
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 22, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @LorrensP-2158466 @bvanjoi

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Oct 22, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: b4c5508 (b4c55082edd8dec08ce8af276d7054d9c4db20c4, parent: f5e2df741b4a9820a7579f0c8eccc951706a8782)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@craterbot check

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

👌 Experiment pr-147984 created and queued.
🤖 Automatically detected try build b4c5508
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-147984 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@jdonszelmann jdonszelmann

Labels

S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

item_like_imports: Can "ambiguity error" items be reexported?

4 participants

@petrochenkov @rustbot @craterbot @jdonszelmann