Skip to content

Conversation

@ericseppanen
Copy link
Contributor

This is a docs-only change for primitive reference.

I noticed a typo ("safe to use at type T") and fixed it to read "safe to use as type T".

While reading over the whole page, I also noticed another sentence that was hard to read. I tried to improve it: feel free to comment on the wisdom of this change...

This sentence was unnecessarily complex; try to simplify it.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 11, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 11, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@ericseppanen ericseppanen changed the title Primitive reference docs tweak primitive reference docs Nov 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants