Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.19

[alexcrichton]

Same as #147495, just keeping it up-to-date.

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[lqd]

👍, r=me when green

View changes since this review

[alexcrichton]

@bors: r=lqd rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 8043cf3 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 8043cf3 with merge c74d8b7...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[jieyouxu]

The self-hosted runner lost communication with the server.

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 8043cf3 with merge f35a2be...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lqd
Pushing f35a2be to main...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 733108b (parent) -> f35a2be (this PR)

Test differences

Show 3 test diffs

3 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard f35a2bee641e88742b6de10b25c748ef57475f24 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. aarch64-apple: 8307.2s -> 6956.0s (-16.3%)
2. dist-aarch64-apple: 7275.1s -> 6207.2s (-14.7%)
3. aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3776.0s -> 3327.6s (-11.9%)
4. x86_64-gnu-tools: 3697.9s -> 3281.5s (-11.3%)
5. i686-gnu-1: 8337.2s -> 7406.6s (-11.2%)
6. i686-gnu-2: 6068.5s -> 5405.3s (-10.9%)
7. pr-check-2: 2563.1s -> 2294.9s (-10.5%)
8. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 3053.6s -> 2754.0s (-9.8%)
9. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3508.9s -> 3165.4s (-9.8%)
10. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-3: 6465.6s -> 5837.1s (-9.7%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (f35a2be): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

• If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
  please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
  @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
• If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
  a new PR with a fix for the regression.
• If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
  you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
  were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -2.7%, secondary -2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.7%	[1.7%, 1.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-4.1%, -2.7%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary -1.1%, secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1

Bootstrap: 472.272s -> 474.05s (0.38%)
Artifact size: 388.64 MiB -> 388.66 MiB (0.01%)