Skip to content

Conversation

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

@bjorn3 bjorn3 commented Nov 21, 2025

This works better with non-LLVM codegen backends.

This works better with non-LLVM codegen backends.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 21, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 21, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 21, 2025

r? @chenyukang

rustbot has assigned @chenyukang.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

I haven't looked at the code yet, but I like the general direction!

The doc comment for https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_target/spec/struct.TargetOptions.html#structfield.features should also be updated.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants