Skip to content

Conversation

@mati865
Copy link
Member

@mati865 mati865 commented Nov 25, 2025

According to

it's tier 2 target.

In case you are wondering how I noticed it:
Dockerfiles at Wild linker repo started to fail building recently due to missing riscv64gc-unknown-linux-musl std. I had hoped the problem would go away by itself, but it did not (it never does...).
#148983 happened recently, so I checked https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup-components-history/riscv64gc-unknown-linux-musl.html and yeah, the date matches.
Given this condition:

if !(tier == 1 || tier == 2) {
I'm certain PR will fix the problem.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 25, 2025

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 25, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 25, 2025

r? @WaffleLapkin

rustbot has assigned @WaffleLapkin.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 25, 2025

📌 Commit fd1852f has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants