Add #[inline] to Layout::is_size_align_valid

[RustyYato]

Fixes #149687

r? @saethlin

[saethlin]

@bors r+ roll-up=iffy (may perturb perf)

[bors]

📌 Commit ae3536e has been approved by saethlin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[saethlin]

@bors rollup=iffy

Yeah I'm on a phone. We really are struggling here aren't we.

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r-

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

(since we're waiting anyway..)

[saethlin]

since we're waiting anyway

Hunh?

Oh. The CI failure is hidden. Ugh

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: d86c359 (d86c359e479b8a350b9a5dd09229e69fe6502004, parent: 66428d92bec337ed4785d695d0127276a482278c)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (d86c359): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[0.1%, 4.3%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.3%	[0.2%, 2.2%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.2%	[0.1%, 4.3%]	4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.4%, secondary 0.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[1.7%, 2.8%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.2%	[5.2%, 5.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.0%	[-4.3%, -1.5%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.6%	[-3.6%, -3.6%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-4.3%, 2.8%]	6

Cycles

Results (primary 5.9%, secondary 0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	5.9%	[5.9%, 5.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.3%	[2.8%, 3.8%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.0%	[-3.3%, -2.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	5.9%	[5.9%, 5.9%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary 1.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	16
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[0.1%, 2.6%]	21
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.7%, -0.1%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[-0.7%, 0.2%]	21

Bootstrap: 470.249s -> 473.304s (0.65%)
Artifact size: 386.85 MiB -> 386.93 MiB (0.02%)