Skip to content

Conversation

@dawidl022
Copy link
Contributor

@dawidl022 dawidl022 commented Dec 7, 2025

There is no need for every contracts test to assert the same warning for using the contracts feature flag, as such use #![expect(incomplete_features)] in the tests, and add one test to specifically check for the warning.

Making this change has been discussed in the comments of #149722.

Contracts tracking issue: #128044

r? Kivooeo

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 7, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 7, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 7, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@dawidl022 dawidl022 force-pushed the contracts/chore/cleanup-warning-in-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 42741c0 to ab2aaa9 Compare December 7, 2025 16:17
@dawidl022
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 7, 2025
@dawidl022 dawidl022 requested a review from jieyouxu December 7, 2025 16:18
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

There is no need for every contracts test to assert the same warning
for using the `contracts` feature flag, as such use
`#![expect(incomplete_features)]` in the tests, and add one test
to specifically check for the warning.
@dawidl022 dawidl022 force-pushed the contracts/chore/cleanup-warning-in-tests branch from ab2aaa9 to 0bd9a2f Compare December 7, 2025 17:29
@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member

Kivooeo commented Dec 7, 2025

@bors r=Kivooeo,jieyouxu rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 7, 2025

📌 Commit 0bd9a2f has been approved by Kivooeo,jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 7, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #148935 (Fix division syntax in doc comments)
 - #149207 (Add `ilog10` result range hints)
 - #149676 (Tidying up tests/ui/issues tests [3/N])
 - #149710 (Move ambient gdb discovery from compiletest to bootstrap)
 - #149714 (Check associated type where-clauses for lifetimes)
 - #149722 (contracts: fix lowering final declaration without trailing semicolon)
 - #149736 (contracts: clean up feature flag warning duplicated across tests)
 - #149739 (mailmap: add binarycat)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d239114 into rust-lang:main Dec 8, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 8, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Rollup merge of #149736 - dawidl022:contracts/chore/cleanup-warning-in-tests, r=Kivooeo,jieyouxu

contracts: clean up feature flag warning duplicated across tests

There is no need for every contracts test to assert the same warning for using the `contracts` feature flag, as such use `#![expect(incomplete_features)]` in the tests, and add one test to specifically check for the warning.

Making this change has been discussed in the comments of #149722.

Contracts tracking issue: #128044

r? Kivooeo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants