Skip to content

Conversation

0xcpu
Copy link
Contributor

@0xcpu 0xcpu commented May 22, 2015

I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses

I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 22, 2015

📌 Commit 18dfa80 has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you!

@0xcpu
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xcpu commented May 22, 2015

Thank you, too! :)

oli-obk pushed a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2015
I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
oli-obk pushed a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2015
I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
oli-obk pushed a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2015
I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 18dfa80 into rust-lang:master May 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants