Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 17 pull requests #25731

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 17 pull requests #25731

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

sorry about that :/ i thought it'd create that branch in my repos only. well, now that it's done I'm at least running make check

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

stage1 passes

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

make check passes

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 23, 2015

📌 Commit 251481f has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r-

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

wait a minute, why does this have 17 PRs when theres only seven in the queue that are open?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

there are some that are already merged

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

oh + the rollup PRs

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

are you on IRC? I'm confused.

@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the rollup branch 2 times, most recently from 2b803dc to 882af3f Compare May 23, 2015 16:37
steveklabnik and others added 16 commits May 23, 2015 18:37
Also, when checking for common gendered words elsewhere, I found one 'he', moved to 'they' as well.

rust-lang#25640 (comment)
Took me a moment to figure out that the appropriate response to
"need program file" was to install the program named "file", not
to think "If I didn't need the program file, why would I be
compiling things?".
The `run` function passed its argument to `msg` via `"$@"`, but `msg`
only printed its first argument. I think the intention was for `msg` to
print all its arguments. (If not, `run` should only `msg "$1"`.)
There are more possible optimizations left (cached length in loops) as
well as some possible bugs (shadowed variables) to fix. This is mostly
syntactic.
I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
@oli-obk oli-obk closed this May 23, 2015
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the rollup branch May 23, 2015 16:46
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.