Use the declarative version of ctor instead of ctor-lite#20
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mads Marquart <mads@marquart.dk>
madsmtm
added
enhancement
kchibisov
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2026
Member
kchibisov
left a comment
kchibisov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have a feeling that we don't even need ctor in the first place here, so we can drop both in the future.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@notgull is stepping down as an open-source maintainer, and has transfered
ctor-litetorust-windowingsince it's used by this project.ctor-litewas created as an alternative toctorthat doesn't depend on proc-macros, but since then,ctoritself has gained this capability via thector::declarativemodule.Even though I disagree with the
ctormaintainer on various points, I also don't have the resources to maintain a fork, so I think we should usectorin this project and sunsetctor-lite.This effectively reverts #12.
Signed-off-by:to all commits to indicate that you have the rights to this change.