Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/adr/ADR-100-cog-packaging-specification.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# ADR-100: Cognitum Cog Packaging Specification

- **Status:** Accepted (formalises existing convention)
- **Status:** Accepted (formalises existing convention) — **first conforming cog shipped 2026-05-19** (`cog-pose-estimation@0.0.1`, see ADR-101)
- **Date:** 2026-05-19
- **Deciders:** ruv

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ stdout JSON line format (one event per line):

## Migration

1. Land this ADR.
2. Land ADR-101 (`cog-pose-estimation` — first Cog built to this spec).
1. Land this ADR.
2. Land ADR-101 (`cog-pose-estimation` — first Cog built to this spec). Shipped in PR #642 + #643 on 2026-05-19; signed `arm` and `x86_64` binaries live at `gs://cognitum-apps/cogs/{arm,x86_64}/`; install verified on cognitum-v0.
3. After two clean releases of `cog-pose-estimation`, re-publish the existing cogs (`anomaly-detect`, `presence`, etc.) with `binary_sha256` + `binary_signature`. Track in a follow-up issue.
4. Flip `cognitum-cog-gateway` from "verify when present" to "require signature" — separate ADR, separate review.

Expand Down
34 changes: 32 additions & 2 deletions docs/adr/ADR-101-pose-estimation-cog.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# ADR-101: Pose Estimation Cog (WiFi-DensePose side)

- **Status:** Accepted
- **Status:** Accepted — **v0.0.1 shipped 2026-05-19** (merged in PRs #642 + #643, signed binaries on GCS, live install on cognitum-v0)
- **Date:** 2026-05-19
- **Deciders:** ruv
- **Companion ADR (v0-appliance side):** v0-appliance ADR-225 (cognitum-pose-estimation crate)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -169,10 +169,40 @@ This confirms the pipeline trains end-to-end and produces a signal-bearing model
3. First release `cog-pose-estimation@0.0.1` ships **only** to `ruvultra` and `cognitum-v0`. Not pushed to the cluster Pis yet.
4. After P7→P9 data work (#640) brings PCK above a usable threshold, rebuild + re-publish; only then enable cluster rollout via `cognitum-cog-gateway`'s OTA channel.

## v0.0.1 shipping status — 2026-05-19

PRs `#642` (scaffold + arm release + ONNX + live install) and `#643` (x86_64 release) landed on `main`. Acceptance gates from ADR-100 met as follows:

| Gate | Status |
|------|--------|
| Cog binary exists per arch | ✅ arm (`3,741,976 B`) + x86_64 (`4,548,856 B`) on GCS |
| Manifest matches schema | ✅ `cog/artifacts/manifests/{arm,x86_64}/manifest.json` |
| Binary sha256 + Ed25519 signature | ✅ both signed with `COGNITUM_OWNER_SIGNING_KEY`, round-trip verified |
| Public-readable GCS | ✅ anonymous HTTP GET works, SHA matches |
| Live install on a real appliance | ✅ `/var/lib/cognitum/apps/pose-estimation/` on `cognitum-v0` (Pi 5), same layout as `anomaly-detect` |
| Runtime contract (`version \| manifest \| health \| run`) | ✅ all four return correct output; `run` emits `pose.frame` events |
| Real weights loaded (not stub) | ✅ `cargo test` asserts `backend.starts_with("candle-")` + non-zero confidence |
| ONNX artifact (for downstream HEF) | ✅ `pose_v1.onnx` (12 KB), parity vs torch = 8.94e-8 |

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Training time (RTX 5080 / Candle CUDA) | 2.1 s for 400 epochs |
| PCK@20 / PCK@50 / MPJPE (1,077-sample seated-desk session) | 3.0% / 18.5% / 0.093 |
| Cold-start: Windows x86_64 | 76 ms |
| Cold-start: ruvultra x86_64 | **5.4 ms** |
| Cold-start: Pi 5 aarch64 | **8.4 ms** |
| Tests | 5/5 pass |

Open follow-ups carried forward from this ADR's "Acceptance gates" section:

- **Hailo HEF cross-compile** — `pose_v1.onnx` is ready; still gated on Hailo Dataflow Compiler + self-hosted runner provisioning. Tracked separately.
- **PCK@20 ≥ 35%** — explicitly not an acceptance gate of this ADR, but the limiting factor on practical usefulness. Tracked in [#640](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/issues/640): needs ~30× more paired samples + multi-room camera framing. Today's seated-desk session is the demonstrated bottleneck.

## See also

- ADR-079: Camera-supervised pose training pipeline (the model we're shipping).
- ADR-100: Cog packaging specification (the format we're shipping in).
- v0-appliance ADR-225: cognitum-pose-estimation crate (the appliance-side runtime).
- v0-appliance ADR-220: cog management surface (where this cog appears in the dashboard).
- Issue #640: PCK gap (current 0% → ≥35% target).
- Issue #640: PCK gap (current 3% / 18.5% → ≥35% target).
- `docs/benchmarks/pose-estimation-cog.md`: full benchmark log, all measured numbers.
Loading