Recognize catalog-backed infra context

[saagpatel]

Summary

• keep raw context quality classification conservative while exposing substantive README support as a reusable signal
• promote only catalog-backed active high-criticality infrastructure from minimum-viable to standard when a separate substantive README supports complete AGENTS/CLAUDE context
• document the scoped reconciliation rule and add regression coverage for both promotion and non-infra non-promotion

Verification

• /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.13 -m py_compile src/portfolio_context_contract.py src/portfolio_truth_reconcile.py
• /opt/homebrew/bin/pytest tests/test_portfolio_context_contract.py -q
• /opt/homebrew/bin/pytest tests/test_portfolio_truth.py tests/test_portfolio_truth_sources.py tests/test_portfolio_context_triage.py -q
• /opt/homebrew/bin/ruff check src/portfolio_context_contract.py src/portfolio_truth_reconcile.py tests/test_portfolio_context_contract.py tests/test_portfolio_truth.py
• /opt/homebrew/bin/pytest tests/test_portfolio_context_contract.py tests/test_portfolio_truth.py tests/test_portfolio_truth_sources.py tests/test_portfolio_context_triage.py -q
• /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.13 -m src.cli --portfolio-truth --portfolio-truth-include-security --portfolio-truth-allow-empty-notion saagpatel
• /opt/homebrew/bin/pytest -q --ignore=tests/test_semantic_index.py --ignore=tests/test_per_section_draft_readmes.py

Notes

• Full suite collection is blocked in this local Python env by missing optional dev dependencies: responses for tests/test_semantic_index.py and fastapi for tests/test_per_section_draft_readmes.py.
• Live portfolio truth carried forward 135 Notion rows because live Notion context was unavailable.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c6db57f21b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Require top-level primary context support

When discovery returns nested context files, such as docs/AGENTS.md, this basename-only set treats it the same as a top-level AGENTS.md. A repo with that nested file plus a substantive top-level README but no top-level AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md will satisfy this helper, so reconciliation can promote an otherwise README-only minimum-viable active infra repo to standard, overstating the primary context contract; compare the relative paths directly before enabling the promotion.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Require catalog-backed infrastructure category

For repos whose catalog sets active/high/maintain but omits category, declared_values["category"] can still be infrastructure via the legacy registry fallback. In that scenario this new predicate promotes minimum-viable to standard and records workspace+catalog, even though the infrastructure evidence came from an old derived surface rather than the catalog-backed contract this rule is meant to require; check the category provenance or the repo/group catalog entries instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[saagpatel]

Post-merge Codex finding disposition: both portfolio context promotion findings were verified against current origin/main and are now tracked in #145.