-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
feat: modify limits commands to align with sf and sfdx #365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@W-11976036@ removed force as the top-level topic add aliases back to original command add flag aliases to maintain backward compatibility sort sobjects by name
…ale/W-11976036-parity # Conflicts: # package.json # yarn.lock
…ale/W-11976036-parity # Conflicts: # package.json
mshanemc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also have Matt review for sf naming conventions
|
@mshanemc we talked after @peternhale and I met and you mentioned you were not a fan of |
@mattgraham who is not a fan? |
My other concern is |
Just for continued conversation knowing this has merged and that we can update as we find the best method for the overall sf pattern: I do like the idea of
then we myabe we add filters in addition to them. Possibly |
|
The merge was reverted so this is still open for discussion. |
@W-11976036@
removed force as the top-level topic
add aliases back to original command
add flag aliases to maintain backward compatibility
sort sobjects by name