fix(cli): always restore project

[sator-imaging]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @sator-imaging, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the reliability of the CLI's test execution process by introducing a mandatory dotnet restore step. This ensures that all project dependencies are consistently available, preventing potential build or test failures caused by an un-restored project state. The change also includes a minor refactoring to improve the clarity of a method parameter name.

Highlights

• Dependency Restoration: A dotnet restore command has been explicitly added to the ExecuteTestAsync method, ensuring that all project dependencies are restored before subsequent clean and build operations.
• Error Handling for Restore: Robust error handling is now in place for the dotnet restore command. If the restore operation fails, an error message is logged, and the process exits with the corresponding failure code.
• Parameter Renaming: The requireDetails boolean parameter in the RunDotnetAsync method has been renamed to requireDetailsTag across its definition and all call sites. This improves clarity by explicitly indicating its purpose related to markdown <details> tags.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a dotnet restore step to update project dependencies and renames the requireDetails parameter to requireDetailsTag for clarity. However, a high-severity Command Injection vulnerability was identified in cli/Program.cs. The application dynamically constructs dotnet commands using user-influenced file paths, which creates a risk of argument injection. It is recommended to refactor the code to use a structured method for passing arguments to processes to prevent this class of vulnerability. Additionally, the introduction of the restore step exacerbates existing code duplication, making the code harder to maintain.