Skip to content

Conversation

@Mia-Cross
Copy link
Contributor

This PR restores the location field that got removed from the json output by #5037

@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross added bug instance Instance issues, bugs and feature requests labels Dec 4, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.41%. Comparing base (bed543b) to head (3b4ecba).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5210   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.41%   58.41%           
=======================================
  Files         310      310           
  Lines       68323    68324    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        39909    39910    +1     
  Misses      26930    26930           
  Partials     1484     1484           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 14:59
@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2025 14:59
@remyleone remyleone changed the title feat(instance): restore location field in json output fix(instance): restore location field in json output Dec 5, 2025
@remyleone remyleone added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into scaleway:master with commit bf71b6d Dec 5, 2025
123 checks passed
@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross deleted the instance_restore_location branch December 5, 2025 12:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug instance Instance issues, bugs and feature requests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants