Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 16, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@jest/globals 29.6.4 -> 29.7.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/jest (source) 29.5.4 -> 29.5.5 age adoption passing confidence
jest (source) 29.6.4 -> 29.7.0 age adoption passing confidence
jest-environment-jsdom 29.6.4 -> 29.7.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jestjs/jest (@​jest/globals)

v29.7.0

Compare Source

Features
  • [create-jest] Add npm init / yarn create initialiser for Jest projects (#​14465)
  • [jest-validate] Allow deprecation warnings for unknown options (#​14499)
Fixes
  • [jest-resolver] Replace unmatched capture groups in moduleNameMapper with empty string instead of undefined (#​14507)
  • [jest-snapshot] Allow for strings as well as template literals in inline snapshots (#​14465)
  • [@jest/test-sequencer] Calculate test runtime if perStats.duration is missing (#​14473)
Performance
  • [@jest/create-cache-key-function] Cache access of NODE_ENV and BABEL_ENV (#​14455)
Chore & Maintenance
  • [jest-cli] Move internal config initialisation logic to the create-jest package (#​14465)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 16, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d91a1f0

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team, QuiiBz and fabienhebert and removed request for a team September 16, 2023 21:28
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (6a03086) 98.69% compared to head (d91a1f0) 98.69%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1521   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.69%   98.69%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines         692      692           
  Branches       97       97           
=======================================
  Hits          683      683           
  Misses          1        1           
  Partials        8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(devdeps): update dependency @types/jest to v29.5.5 chore(devdeps): update jest monorepo Sep 17, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from a06a0d9 to f07062c Compare September 17, 2023 09:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from f07062c to fced39c Compare September 18, 2023 08:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-monorepo branch from fced39c to d91a1f0 Compare September 18, 2023 08:08
@chambo-e chambo-e merged commit 4497b10 into main Sep 18, 2023
@chambo-e chambo-e deleted the renovate/jest-monorepo branch September 18, 2023 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants