Skip to content

BB-743 missing scality group on docker image#2714

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/9.0from
bugfix/BB-743-scality-group-missing-federation-image
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

BB-743 missing scality group on docker image#2714
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/9.0from
bugfix/BB-743-scality-group-missing-federation-image

Conversation

@tcarmet
Copy link
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Feb 9, 2026

A scality user and group is required for the federation image. Now creating both and adding the scality user to the node group

Before:

scality@c3de243e2c65:~/backbeat$ id scality          
uid=1000(scality) gid=1000(node) groups=1000(node)   

After:

scality@e506d63687e3:~/backbeat$ id                                            
uid=1001(scality) gid=1001(scality) groups=1001(scality),1000(node)            

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 9, 2026

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 9, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue BB-743 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.0.23

  • 9.1.6

  • 9.2.1

Please check the Fix Version/s of BB-743, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.39%. Comparing base (0994bb0) to head (162b308).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on development/9.0.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 80.20% <ø> (ø)
Core Library 81.14% <ø> (+0.18%) ⬆️
Ingestion 70.81% <ø> (+0.52%) ⬆️
Lifecycle 78.67% <ø> (ø)
Oplog Populator 85.06% <ø> (ø)
Replication 58.48% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.0    #2714      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            74.27%   74.39%   +0.11%     
===================================================
  Files                  202      202              
  Lines                13472    13472              
===================================================
+ Hits                 10006    10022      +16     
+ Misses                3456     3440      -16     
  Partials                10       10              
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.45% <ø> (ø)
api:routes 9.26% <ø> (ø)
bucket-scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
ft_test:queuepopulator 10.19% <ø> (-0.56%) ⬇️
ingestion 12.56% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
lib 7.46% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
lifecycle 18.65% <ø> (ø)
notification 1.04% <ø> (ø)
replication 18.61% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
unit 50.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested a review from a team February 9, 2026 21:49
@tcarmet tcarmet marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2026 21:50
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 9, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@tcarmet
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcarmet commented Feb 9, 2026

/create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 9, 2026
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 9, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 9, 2026

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tcarmet tcarmet requested a review from a team February 9, 2026 22:51
@tcarmet
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcarmet commented Feb 10, 2026

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 10, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

  • ✔️ development/9.2

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-743.

Goodbye tcarmet.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 162b308 into development/9.0 Feb 10, 2026
10 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/BB-743-scality-group-missing-federation-image branch February 10, 2026 00:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Comments