FIX Run common tests on SparseCoder#32077
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <jeremie@probabl.ai>
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <jeremie@probabl.ai>
| @property | ||
| def n_features_in_(self): | ||
| """Number of features seen during `fit`.""" | ||
| return self.dictionary.shape[1] | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note for reviewers: With this modification, n_features_in_ is now only set if fit is called. It makes this estimator follow our API and in line with this discussion #27724 (comment)
…te fit docstring, refactor check_array parameters
…kit-learn into SparseCoder_common_tests
jeremiedbb
left a comment
jeremiedbb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A couple of suggestions for the docstrings. Looks good otherwise. Please also add a changelog entry. You can say that SparseCoder now follows the transformer API of scikit-learn and that now parameter and input validation is executed in fit (you can follow these instructions to write a changelog fragment https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/main/doc/whats_new/upcoming_changes/README.md)
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <jeremie@probabl.ai>
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <jeremie@probabl.ai>
jeremiedbb
added
the
Waiting for Second Reviewer
|
maybe @adrinjalali for a second review since you reviewed the previous attempt #27724. |
…ancement.rst Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <jeremie@probabl.ai>
| }, | ||
| SkewedChi2Sampler: {"check_dict_unchanged": dict(n_components=1)}, | ||
| SparseCoder: { | ||
| "check_estimators_dtypes": dict(dictionary=rng.normal(size=(5, 5))), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is there a single case where we can set to have it pass all the tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
dictionary is not a very friendly parameter because it needs to have a shape compatible with X, but all the checks have different Xs
| f"Skipping check_set_output_transform for {name}: Does not support" | ||
| " set_output API" | ||
| ) | ||
| estimator = next(_yield_instances_for_check(check_set_output_transform, estimator)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
seems to be a nice catch, but I think we should then go through all instances for this test, instead of only the first one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes indeed, for the sparsecoder right now it's always one instance but it can be more. I'll add a for loop to go through all instances.
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
| - :class:`decomposition.SparseCoder` now follows the transformer API of scikit-learn. | |||
| In addition, the :meth:`fit` method now validates the input and parameters. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please reference yourself as author of the PR: "By :user:`your name <your handle>`".
3 participants
Reference Issues/PRs
Towards #26482
See also #27724 and #26691 which appear to be stalled.
Closes #27724
Closes #26691
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
This runs the common estimator tests on SparseCoder.
To match the behavior expected by the common tests,
n_components_andn_features_in_are changed from properties to attributes initialized in thefitmethod.validate_datais run infit.Specific
dictionaryarguments for checks are added inPER_ESTIMATOR_CHECK_PARAMS.To be able to use a specific
dictionaryincheck_set_output_transform,_yield_instances_for_checkis used intest_set_output_transform.