Lower pins test #95
Merged
Lower pins test #95
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
YooSunYoung
force-pushed
the
lower-pins-test
branch
from
52a021e to
344ca35
Compare
Closed
jokasimr
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
nvaytet
reviewed
Aug 5, 2025
pyproject.toml
Outdated
Comment on lines
35
to
36
| "graphviz", | ||
| "plopp[all]", |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are there no lower bounds for graphviz and plopp?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added a bound on plopp now.
I can see that other projects do not seem to have a lower bounds on graphviz, so I left it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reopening #93
I rebased
lower-pinsbranch touse-new-nexus-filesfor testing the tests(?) with lower pins.It's using new
essreduceinterface now.