Skip to content

Conversation

@rwedge
Copy link
Contributor

@rwedge rwedge commented Feb 25, 2025

resolves #2365

CU-86b3wt5cy

@sdv-team
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.59%. Comparing base (bd127b9) to head (b93f2e5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2393   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.59%   98.59%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        6214     6214           
=======================================
  Hits         6127     6127           
  Misses         87       87           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 82.39% <ø> (ø)
unit 97.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rwedge rwedge force-pushed the issue-2365-improve-dtypes-benchmark branch from 6ad0c34 to eed8b6a Compare February 25, 2025 21:16
@rwedge rwedge requested a review from frances-h February 26, 2025 17:19
@rwedge rwedge force-pushed the issue-2365-improve-dtypes-benchmark branch from df3b633 to ee97bc1 Compare March 26, 2025 15:28
from tests._external.slack_utils import post_slack_message

GDRIVE_OUTPUT_FOLDER = '16SkTOyQ3xkJDPJbyZCusb168JwreW5bm'
GDRIVE_OUTPUT_FOLDER = '1tjre6vNnbAv6jyfsF8N8EZfDX7Rx2HCT'
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will need to revert once code review is complete

)
slack_message = '\n'.join(slack_messages)
slack_channel = 'sdv-alerts'
slack_channel = 'sdv-alerts-debug'
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will also need to revert

@rwedge rwedge force-pushed the issue-2365-improve-dtypes-benchmark branch from 7ab670e to 7cfeb4d Compare April 3, 2025 20:58
@rwedge rwedge marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2025 15:57
@rwedge rwedge requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2025 15:57
@rwedge rwedge requested a review from R-Palazzo April 4, 2025 15:57
Copy link
Contributor

@frances-h frances-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking really good! Just one minor comment

)

if current_value and not stored_value:
if current_value == 1.0 and not stored_value == 1.0:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use stored_value != 1.0 here instead of not stored_value == 1.0?

@rwedge rwedge force-pushed the issue-2365-improve-dtypes-benchmark branch from 4f2144f to ea09a05 Compare April 16, 2025 20:01
@rwedge rwedge requested a review from frances-h April 16, 2025 21:16
@rwedge rwedge force-pushed the issue-2365-improve-dtypes-benchmark branch from ea09a05 to b93f2e5 Compare April 17, 2025 19:42
@rwedge rwedge merged commit b756c57 into main Apr 17, 2025
45 checks passed
@rwedge rwedge deleted the issue-2365-improve-dtypes-benchmark branch April 17, 2025 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve dtypes benchmark report

5 participants