Change `prevents` to `prohibits`

[rjyounes]

Our definition of prevents refers to intentions (e.g., laws) that prohibit certain behavior. However, the word "prevents" has two meanings:

1. An action or object that makes certain behavior impossible - e.g., a fence or the act of installing a fence that prevents someone from entering private land
2. The law that prohibits someone from entering private land marked with "no trespassing" signs.

Do we want the predicate to encompass both definitions or only, as currently, the second?

For both meanings:

• Change rdfs:domain to gist:domainIncludes
• Broaden the text definition and examples.

For only the second meaning: Change the property name to prohibits. Granted, "prohibits" can sometimes have the first sense, but it seems to me less likely to be interpreted that way. "Forbids" is perhaps less ambiguous but has a less formal or legal tone.

Note also that prevents implies successful prohibition, which is not what we are trying to capture, I believe. Laws that prohibit certain actions do not always succeed in preventing them. So I conclude that prohibits is the better term.

[rjyounes]

Minor impact if prevents is deprecated.

[rjyounes]

gist dev team meeting 11/24/2025

DECISION:
For gist 14.1.0:

• Deprecate prevents and add prohibits.
• Add prevents isSupersededBy prohibits.
• Add scope note to distinguish from "prevents."
• Change definition to not use the word "prohibit." (E.g., "intends to prevent" or "forbids.")

For gist 15.0.0:
Remove prevents.